頁:
[1]
2
解放軍海軍使用世界上最先進的垂直發射系統
本帖最後由 MightyDragon 於 2012-9-23 12:27 PM 編輯解放軍海軍使用所謂「最先進的垂直發射系統」，只是由於「GJB 5860-2006垂發系統的標準是有著世界上垂發導彈中最大的直徑和長度」，就個人而言這是意義不大！更大更長的導彈明顯是有更大的射程和威力，但更大的導彈隔室在同一的時間限制了導彈的總數量！因此當面臨飽和攻擊時，可以同時發射的導彈數量比較西方的標準更少。這種弱點應該輔之以更大尺寸的艦身增加攜帶導彈的數量，由此中國需要多艘比052D更大的驅逐艦捍衛其航母...
Source: Posted September 4, 2012 by admin in China Military News
2012-09-03 (China Military News by China-defense-mashup)– Since the launching of the Chinese Navy 052D missile destroyer at the end of August 2012, some new technologies in the destroyer is widely concerned in Chinese mainland and overseas analysers, including whether new vertical launch system is applied in the the 052D missile destroyers. But some public informations of Chinese National standards information let the outside world roughly understand “tip of the iceberg” of Type 052D destroyer’s new vertical launch system.
The GJB 5860-2006 “surface ship missile universal vertical launcher General requirements” has been the announced Chinese national military standard. The standard file is one kind of specification materials used to guide surface ship tactical missiles and missile-related technology. And it is development guide for Chinese Surface warship’s general missile vertical launch system.
The standard files was issued in 2006, when the Type 052D destroyer was possible developed. And this standard has been applied to the 052D missile destroyer in the design and construction process. It means that Type 052D is the first surface combatants whose construction in accordance with the GJB 5860-2006 standards. In GJB 5860-2006, it can be seen that this general vertical launch system with three sizes of modules, to adapt to different sizes of warships. The large launch module can load missile with length not exceeding 9000mm; the medium module Ba shot module can load missile with length not exceeding 7000mm; a small one can not exceed 3300mm.
The large launch module is up to staggering 9 meters, and has exceeded the the U.S. MK41 and French Sylver VLS system to create the world’s most. The “surface ship missile universal vertical launcher General requirements” also displays that an unprecedented 850 mm diameter of a single unit, also be larger MK41 system, which means that the new VLS system is capable of launching large size missile, even including anti-satellite and anti-missile missile system.
GJB 5860-2006 standard requires that a control unit should be able to control the launch of four rounds of different types of missiles, which means that the future Chinese naval vessels will also use the new short-range air defense missile similar to ESSM missile, which is “4-in-1〞 mode.
In fact, a direct result of the implementation of the technical specifications is Type 052D destroyer’s vertical launch system. 052D should use medium-sized VLS module for expansibility in the future, almost be able to launch all future missiles developed for the Navy, and cold/hot launch modes can be compatible in in one system. emission and thermal emission in two ways. Type 052D destroyer of the Chinese navy more advanced destroyer will likely be equipped with large transmitter module, to realize sea-based anti-ballistic missile or sea-based anti-satellite warfare.
Launching a larger diameter and greater length of the missile is always a trend in world VLS development. U.S. MK57 “CCL” concentric new vertical launch system will be able to launch the missiles of the larger size, but China’s new VLS seems better....<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容，請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div><div></div> 其實應該是飛彈無法向西方國家做得那麼精細，以至於飛彈要加長，以至於代的飛彈量會比較少，這樣說會比較讓人能理解。 這則消息前兩天剛再CD上看過，這麼快就傳到外國了。果然是互聯網時代無秘密啊！{:49:} 有人說052D的垂直發射系統會影響艦體結構強度.如果是擺橫的.艦體寬度的那兩側支撐架構就薄弱.如果是擺直的就比較不影響 9米深的坑估計要放CJ-10進去！
那樣老共的船艦就能有中程對陸的強大打擊能力了！<br><br><br><br><br><div></div> 微笑的羅生門 發表於 2012-9-5 09:10 PM static/image/common/back.gif
9米深的坑估計要放CJ-10進去！
那樣老共的船艦就能有中程對陸的強大打擊能力了！ ...
東海-10艦射型大概亦有四千公里的射程，由上海勉強可打至北海道...
說真的這有點太可怕！ 那張圖片怎麼有大火...那是發生了甚麼事....看起來也不像爆炸?....看不懂是怎麼了{:34:} 胖貓咪 發表於 2012-9-5 09:45 PM static/image/common/back.gif
那張圖片怎麼有大火...那是發生了甚麼事....看起來也不像爆炸?....看不懂是怎麼了 ...
這是熱發射導彈！這個中國的新型垂直發射系統同時支援冷發射和熱發射，新舊型導彈都合用！ 胖貓咪 發表於 2012-9-5 09:45 PM static/image/common/back.gif
那張圖片怎麼有大火...那是發生了甚麼事....看起來也不像爆炸?....看不懂是怎麼了 ...
導彈發射時的尾焰 被管道引導島甲板上了要不影響散熱 原來是熱導彈要發射的火焰...感謝上面兩位大大的回覆...對於軍事裝備還有許多要認識學習的地方{:45:}<br><br><br><br><br><div></div> 另一觀點更大並不代表射的一定遠 也許些技術未到位所以要大一點 中國許多技術多為仿造改良改進故與正規原廠設計與穩定尚有出入 胖貓咪 發表於 2012-9-5 10:00 PM static/image/common/back.gif
原來是熱導彈要發射的火焰...感謝上面兩位大大的回覆...對於軍事裝備還有許多要認識學習的地方 ...
其實熱發射是舊式,但比較安全,也比較易容被敵方的紅外線雷達發現,
冷發射是未來的趨勢,它是彈射至空中再點火,但也比較危險,
萬一點火失敗掉下來會很慘,匿蹤軍艦一艦都採這個方式
...<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容，請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div> 了解...感謝上面大大回覆....原來冷熱方式各有利弊...或者以後會針對兩種方式的缺點加以改進而發展更新的方式也說不定{:45:} 坦白說
對於這種透露出來的情報我是存疑
光看規格好像還不錯
但是精確度???準度???威力???約當噸數???
這些資訊都沒有的狀況下
就號稱自己是"最強"
聽聽就好了... yastern 發表於 2012-9-5 10:35 PM static/image/common/back.gif
另一觀點更大並不代表射的一定遠 也許些技術未到位所以要大一點 中國許多技術多為仿造改良改進故與正規原廠 ...
更長更粗的當然並不代表一定射得遠，但更短更幼的一定代表射得不遠 {:3:}
想要加長導彈射程的多數只能變更為更長更粗的多級火箭......<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容，請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div><br><br><br><br><br><div></div>
頁:
[1]
2